SPEAKERS

Dr Peter McCullough

Dr Peter McCullough  00:00

I’m Dr. Peter McCullough and I’m an internist and cardiologist and academic physician, professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine on the Baylor Dallas campus. I think this whole pandemic, from the beginning was about the vaccine. So I think all roads lead to the vaccine, and what it means. There are already places in South East Asia in Europe, they’re laying the groundwork for a compulsory vaccination, I mean, compulsory, that means somebody pins you down to the ground and puts a needle in you. That’s how bad stakeholders want vaccination. Listen, it’s not of costs, you don’t have to pay for this, it’s all provided. There are people or stakeholders, they do want a needle in every arm, this needle in every arm is a very important moniker. Why? Why do you want a needle in arm? Let’s take COVID recovered, can’t get the virus can’t receive it, it has nothing to, why would they ever want a needle in the arm of a COVID recovered patient? Why? Three studies show higher safety events? You see, the tension that Americans are feeling right now, as they try to keep their jobs and go to work is they know they can die of the vaccine. That’s the problem. If the vaccine was like water, and we just got it no side effects, who wouldn’t take it, say hell I’ll comply they got my social security number anyway in a database. I’m already marked, I’ll just get marked. But no, there’s something very unique about this vaccine. It’s something about injecting something into a body that is so important to stakeholders that it doesn’t matter. Kids 12 years old told they can make their own decision on this. And it could be their fatal decision. Think about that. North Carolina just passed that, oh kids 12 years old can make them decide on their own. There are over 4000 dead Americans, there’s over 10,000 dead people in Europe that died on days one, two and three after the vaccine. Why are we pushing this in a way where people’s jobs and their education [and] their livelihood decide on a decision that’s potentially fatal? The tension, you can cut it with a knife. There are parents who say, listen, I want my kid to go to college this year, but I don’t want to lose them to the vaccine. They know what’s going on. The internet is full of these cases, blood clots, strokes, immediate death. Now unfortunately I have not directly lost a patient to the vaccine. I told you most got vaccinated in January, December, January, February, based on the safety data now I can no longer recommend it. I can’t recommend it. It’s passed all the thresholds to being a safe product. It’s not a safe product. None of them are. It’s not just Johnson and Johnson. In fact, more of the safety events in the United States have occurred with Moderna and Pfizer. There are now papers written by prominent scientists calling for a worldwide halt in the programme. There are prominent virologists many of them, including Nobel Prize winners who have said, listen, if we vaccinate people, and we create a very narrow, incomplete library of immunity, which is what the vaccine is, the vaccines are all targeted to the original Wuhan spike protein, which is long gone, that’s extinct. Patients are getting vaccinated for something that doesn’t even exist anymore. That Wuhan spike protein is gone. We’re hoping the immunity covers the other variants, but that narrow immunity is a setup. It’s just like giving everybody a narrow spectrum antibiotic. If you did that, what would happen? We grow up superbugs. There are warnings out there saying don’t do this. don’t vaccinate the entire world. All we’re gonna do is set ourselves up for a superbug that’s gonna really wipe out populations. So for many reasons, the vaccine indiscriminate vaccination is a horrendous idea. It’s a horrendous bioweapon that’s been thrust onto the public, and it’s going to cause great personal harm, which it already has. 1000s of people have lost their lives. I’ve never lost a direct patient, but I’ve had my patients lose their family members, lots of them. I filled out a safety report on a patient who developed blood clots after one of the Pfizer Moderna vaccine, and I’m telling you it took half an hour to do it. There was many pages and each page said warning, federal offence punishable by a severe fines and penalties if I falsified a report. All those 1000s of Americans have died with the vaccine and hospitalizations in the database I think are real, and they are far beyond anything we’ve ever seen. And as a doctor and as a public citizen, I am extraordinarily concerned about the vaccine. The vaccine centre right down the street here is empty. I drive past it every day. Americans know, they’re talking to each other, the vaccines not safe. And now the effort is the vaccine stakeholders want kids without parental guidance, and now they want to be in the church, Americans and people worldwide should be extraordinarily alarmed.

Dr Peter McCullough  04:49

I think it’s about what the vaccine means. And Whitney Webb gets credit for this back in April. She said Aha, I figured this out. This is what globalists have been waiting for. They’ve been waiting for a way of marking people that you getting a vaccine, you’re marked in a database. And this can be used for trade, for commerce, for behaviour modification, all different purposes. And you see it right here in Dallas, they’ve announced, you know, you can’t go to a Dallas Mavericks game unless you’re vaccinated. You’ve heard people say, Listen, you have passports, you had colleges today announced that they’re not gonna give any credit to natural immunity. Every scientist in the world knows that the natural immunity is way better than the vaccine immunity. If it’s about COVID why don’t we have [the] COVID recovered go to the Mavericks games? Why don’t we have COVID recovered people freely go to college?

Dr Peter McCullough  05:39

Why do we have to have faulty vaccine immunity be the priority and have natural immunity not count? See these types of things make me think that Whitney Webb is correct. This is actually about marking, the vaccine is a way of marking people. It’s a way of starting to assert efforts to create compliance, behaviour control. Don’t forget the vaccine is just a starter. Now there’s going to be updates, there’s going to be boosters, they are already prepping people for this. There’s going to be more. The vaccine manufacturers are all linked. They’re all uniquely indemnified. What medical product is there indemnification where something happens to you, you don’t have any recourse? You know, a woman gets vaccinated, a pregnant woman, she has no maternal foetal rights, something happens to her baby, she’s out of luck. This is extraordinary what Americans are doing. It’s absolutely extraordinary what’s being thrust upon us now?

Dr Peter McCullough  06:39

Well, the US FDA regulatory guidance and vaccines and there have been modern vaccines, you don’t have to pick the old ones. I mean, we’ve had modern vaccines, shingles vaccines, hepatitis B, meningococcal vaccines, demand a minimum of two years of safety data, two years by regulatory effect this it kind of written and codified into the regulatory rules for the manufacturers. That was all thrown out and said two months, for COVID, two months, so two months of observational data. This idea that we could vaccinate people that were not even tested in the trials, that has never been done before. We have never just thrown a vaccine at somebody without having any data. None. So the very first pregnant woman that was vaccinated here in the United States, it was done with no knowledge of safety, and no knowledge of efficacy. And the argument that we’ve heard, the argument that we’ve heard is well COVID-19 is a bad illness. 600,000 people have died, the vaccine could help them, we should give it a shot. Come on, we should just give it a shot. While that 600,000 died, I’ve already told you 85 percent  of that was preventable with early treatment, which was actively suppressed and squashed. And not only that, if this vaccine can help them the vaccine better be safe, it better be safe. And my comments on the vaccine are safety, safety, safety. Let’s see it. Let’s see it and Americans are just like the Americans should have been getting weekly updates on treatment innovations. Americans should have been getting weekly updates on vaccine safety. Very important, weekly updates from our federal officials on safety. Super important. Those two things are probably the two largest acts of malfeasance in all of medical regulatory history. It will go down in history of malfeasance, wrongdoing by those of authority. How come there was no updates on treatment and no promotion of early treatment to reduce hospitalisation and death? And now when we released the vaccine, why are there no safety updates? Why are there no attempts for risk mitigation in terms of making the vaccine programme safer? How do we have all these vaccines? How do we know we can vaccinate pregnant women? We know because of years and years and years of safety data, before a vaccine has ever been injected into a pregnant woman its probably been tested for decades before we try it on a pregnant woman. We would never out of the box take a brand new technology that’s never been tested before ever. And we know that the vaccine technology produces the dangerous spike protein, it produced the Wuhan spike protein, the spicule on the ball of the virus itself, which damages blood vessels and causes blood clotting and all of them do. We would never unleash that into a pregnant woman’s body. Americans have to understand something is very wrong what’s going on  now in the world. These are examples, are clear cut examples of wrongdoing that is at such a high level the group think is in the wrong direction in such a consistent and overwhelming way that people are being harmed in an extraordinary fashion.

Dr Peter McCullough  10:08

To make the problem worse than what it is many methods to make the case count look higher than what it is. Make the mortality numbers look worse than what they are. Many methods to create the reaction out of proportion to the reality, so lockdowns, fears, economic suffering, what have you. All of these things making the pandemic way worse than what it is, okay to have that occur? More fear, suffering, hospitalisation, death, loneliness, lockdown in order to promote mass vaccination. These two are tightly linked. Now mass vaccination at all costs. The world must be mass vaccinated, and human beings on earth ought to understand at this point in time, what we’re seeing is unprecedented. It became known the virus was going to be amenable to a vaccine somewhere around April May, and at that point in time, therapy was suppressed everything, nothing could be published, everything. The fake Lancet paper, squash treatment, and then prepare the population for vaccination. Once the vaccines come out, they’re short tracked. There’s all kinds of enthusiasm regarding it, you know, needles in all the arms, trucks rolling, Americans cheering, and then the mass vaccination programme starts off. And then before we know it, we’re vaccinating pregnant women, why are we doing that? That can’t be safe. Now we’re gonna vaccinate COVID recovery patients. Wait a minute, they have complete and robust permanent immunity. No one’s ever challenged the immunity of a COVID recovery patient, why are we vaccinating them, and then it keeps going and going. At first we vaccinated high risk people I didn’t really understand vaccinating young healthcare workers because they weren’t at risk. There were never any hospital outbreaks in the United States. The only thing was clear nursing home workers gave it to nursing home patients, we knew that. So nursing home workers should have been vaccinated, and then maybe high risk people and we should call it a day. I always estimated maybe 20 million people need to be vaccinated. But that didn’t seem to satisfy the vaccine stakeholders, which are Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca and any others that come forward, the CDC, the FDA, and the NIH, and the White House, massive vaccine stakeholders. You can throw in [the] Gates Foundation, World Health Organisation, you can throw those in as well, massive stakeholders, and they wanted everybody to be vaccinated without exception. No one will escape the needle. We’ve actually never had this before. And the vaccine process is extraordinary. There’s a consent form. It says this is investigational, we don’t know if it’s going to work. There’s only two months of data. The side effects could be a sore arm all the way to death. And we don’t know sign here. We need your identifying information. We need a barcode on the file, we need you identified and now you’re in a database, you’re vaccinated. And so this mass vaccination is extraordinarily concerning. We never vaccinate into the middle of a pandemic never. We’ve never had an effective vaccine for respiratory virus, including influenza, it’s only modestly effective. We knew from the published data that the attack rates in placebo in the vaccine arms were less than 1 percent. So we know that the vaccine can have a less than 1 percent effect in the population. Why would it be any different than the clinical trials? We knew from the clinical trials that it didn’t stop COVID-19 so people can get COVID-19 anyway. What would be this incredible drive to vaccinate everybody and now oh my Lord, now the vaccine within a few months has been completely weaponized. Now as travel is related to the vaccine, people can’t go to school without the vaccine, people are losing their jobs without the vaccine. Believe me there is something very, very potent in this vaccine. It should be disturbing to everybody the word vaccine ought to be the most disturbing word that they have seen. Now we have 12 year old children who are told they can decide on their own whether or not they could take a vaccine. So you know, about 70 percent of my patients are vaccinated, I’m very pro vaccine, I’ve taken all the vaccines myself, about 70 percent and they were all vaccinated in December, January and February. But as we sit here today in May, we have over 4000 vaccine related deaths and over 10,000 hospitalizations. The limit to shut down a programme is about 25 to 50 deaths, swine flu 1976 25 deaths, they shut down the programme. It’s not safe. All the vaccines in the United States per year what (inaudible) gets reported in the database is about 200, and we’re talking about vaccinating probably you know 500 million injections. Here in the United States at 100 million people vaccinated, this is far and away the most lethal, toxic biologic agent ever injected into a human body in American history. And it’s going strong, with no mention of safety by our officials, with wild enthusiasm by our hospitals and hospital administrators, with doctors supporting it. Doctors are saying now they won’t see patients in their waiting room without the vaccine. This problem COVID-19 was actually from the very beginning, Mrs. Whitney Webb said, she goes COVID-19 is actually about the vaccine. It’s not about the virus, it’s about the vaccine.

Dr Peter McCullough  15:46

My personal situation, professional situation is a position of strength. And those who’ve attempted in any way to pressure, coerce, or threaten me with reprisal have paid an extraordinary price. And I think that’s an important message to get out there. There is a position of strength, based on principles of compassion and care and of the Hippocratic oath and of the fiduciary relationship that a doctor has to a patient and a prominent doctor has to a population that supersedes all of those other ill intents and what I say is bring em on.