Sharing this PCR test fraud documentary. Remember, 45 amplification cycles are being used by the NHS for the PCR test. GUIDANCE-AND-SOP-COVID-19-VIRUS-TESTING-IN-NHS-LABORATORIES-v1-16-march(1) PDF. And according to the pseudoscience testing protocols, if you test positive for a lateral flow, you have to confirm it with a PCR test. People continue with the testing protocols like sheep to the slaughter. They are also incredibly dangerous.
The antigen lateral flow tests are also fraudulent, see this post and this one. I take ignorance of a genuine email with a few simple questions on as evidence of guilt. These are the manufacturers of the tests.
This is the post of a man taking no swab for a PCR test and yet it testing positive. Absolute madness as to why people want to play a part in this biggest PCR test fraud to come upon humanity and huge depopulation agenda through the ‘COVID vaccines’.
Stop getting tested with the PCR test fraud because you are participating in a lie and it is leading to fraudulent statistics that is forcing lockdowns.
Transcription of this video to follow.
SPEAKERS
Sarah, Dr Stefan Lanka, Dr Malcolm Kendrick, Senior NHS Board Member Speaking to Brian Gerrish UK Column 18 April 2021, Dr Andreas Noack, Angela Merkel, Prof Sucharit Bhakdi, Reporter, Dr Kerry Chant, NHS Vaccine Propaganda Advert, Male Protestor, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Joe Biden, Gladys Berejiklian, Kary Mullis, Politician, CNN Reporter, ABC News, Meinrad Spitz, Claudia, Female Protestor, Detmat Lukas, Fox News Channel, Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews, Speaker Unknown, Tony Blair, Testing Propaganda Advert, George, Journalist
CNN Reporter 00:05
If you look at the case curve Coronavirus cases it’s just stunning.
Gladys Berejiklian 00:08
633 cases of community transmission.
CNN Reporter 00:11
Case count is so high because of this the positivity rate.
ABC News 00:14
US topping 100,000 cases
CNN Reporter 00:16
As Americans get tested for Coronavirus,
Speaker Unknown 00:18
4,697
CNN Reporter 00:21
new confirmed cases
Speaker Unknown 00:22
17 new cases
CNN Reporter 00:24
50,000 cases, new cases up 10% or more
Dr Kerry Chant 00:30
I can’t express enough my level of concern at these rising numbers of cases daily
Speaker Unknown 00:36
COVID case loads (many people speaking) cases in a single day than any other day of the pandemic.
Female Protestor 00:46
Freedom. Freedom. My sister she works for [a] millionaire family she’s in Croatia. Now they took a private jet. She didn’t even have to do a PCR tests. What is this COVID that goes with rich people, with millionaires,
Male Protestor 01:27
The man who actually invented he got the Nobel Prize for it. He said do not use it for diagnosis.
Male Protestor 01:33
This test was not made for diagnostic purposes.
Speaker Unknown 01:37
You can even get a positive test with that without having any genetic material being present.
Male Protestor 01:46
It’s just a multiplication tool.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 01:48
The key thing about PCR is that if you keep multiplying and multiplying and multiplying again and again and again, the chance of false positives goes up and up and up
Dr Stefan Lanka 01:56
Especially biochemistry they’re hiding with this knowledge they have not a standing to come up and say hey man, what you are doing it’s not allowed. It’s completely irrational. It’s anti scientific.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 02:09
It beggars belief that they are doing these things that are scientifically fraud in my opinion, I mean, I think you’d have to use the word fraud. These are scientific frauds.
Meinrad Spitz 02:40
In Germany we have a word we say he is avoiding it like the devil the holy water. If I show them this graph, they are winding like a snake. They don’t want to see it. If the overall mortality is not increasing, and only the tests are, then could it be that the tests are wrong? I guess they fear about to understand it at all.
Dr Stefan Lanka 03:23
If you are in fear, logic won’t reach you then facts won’t matter. And the one challenging this questioning is perceived as an aggressor. And is just wondering, is asking question is, you know, the opting, which is the first challenge and first duty of every scientist to doubt everything. I mean, and sure, from their point of view, they consider me as as a conspiracy against the state because the state is you know, it’s one with medicine.
Angela Merkel 04:05
My fellow citizens. What a year we have behind us. In 2020, our world was struck by something completely unexpected. A previously unknown virus that has invaded our bodies and our lives. It hit us in the places where we are most human: in close contact, in hugs, conversations, celebrations.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 04:28
This means that if you are under seventy in this country, and do not have a seriously previous illness, then it is almost impossible to die from this virus.
Meinrad Spitz 04:44
There are different actions I have created, and this what I’m doing here is the third action. My goal is to talk with the politicals, really to start a talk when they leave or come to the parliament.
Speaker Unknown 04:59
So I will go inside until I reach to the nasal pharyngeal,
Meinrad Spitz 05:06
The entrance question, what I give to them is, do you know that that exponential increase of infection was created by an exponential increase of the test? This is a just a very very simple fact. And everyone can check it. And they almost know nothing about it.
Claudia 05:40
I’m convinced a lot of journalists, they only believe what they tell the population, unfortunately.
Journalist 05:47
You think they believe it. So do you think that all these journalists are unaware of the basic problems with the PCR test?
Claudia 05:55
No, not all. I think a good part, because they do not want to occupy themselves with the facts.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 06:18
Kary Mullis, who invented the PCR test, he said, and this was first used when HIV came along. He said you can’t use it as a diagnostic test. It is not a diagnostic test. He invented the damn thing.
Reporter 06:31
I want to ask Dr Kary, how do they misuse PCR to estimate all these supposed free viral RNAs that may or may not be there?
Kary Mullis 06:45
Is this, I think misused, PCR is not quite. I don’t think you can misuse PCR. No the results, the interpretation of it, see, if you can say if they would, if they could find this virus in you at all. And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right? I mean, because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body. Okay. So that could be thought of as a misuse of it just to claim that it’s meaningful.
Detmat Lukas 07:28
First of all, the unreliable PCR test has to be questioned completely. Secondly, do a much more comprehensive study to see if it does not respond positively to other types of pathogenic viruses. And at the very least one has to very clearly distinguish whether a positive PCR test actually indicates an infection. And very often this is not the case. If this test – this PCR – is not reliable what are these people dying from? Is there a different diagnosis? Do they also look to see if other viruses are present? Or are they only testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus with a test that is very unreliable? My name is Detmat Lukas. I’m a psycho trauma therapist living in Berlin. I started my protest here in front of the Robert Koch Institute nine weeks ago. And my main objective is to clarify the reliability of the PCR test.
Dr Stefan Lanka 08:53
If you’re doing it in a good manner in a real scientific manner, you just can prove the presence of a known piece and a known way short piece of genetic material, because this is what PCR is able to do, to detect and to multiply a known thought piece of genetic material, so it never is able to detect a big piece of DNA. They say, well, if you get a piece out of the virus, we equal this of the presence of an intact virus. But every geneticists known that half of our chromosomes are filled up with all kinds of pieces from viruses and they call it they are endogenous they are inside they are part of us, you know. So to just mighty play the PCR a genetic sequence and claim now we found a virus, this is impossibly justifiable. Imagine you are amplifying a part of an old car, and then you just amplify it and you claim look, now I have a Porsche 911, you know proven being there, you know. Instead you have just proven the existence of electric switch which were used not only in Porches, but even in houses or in bicycles or in a camera, right? And that you claim, look, I had this piece, therefore, the Porsche 911 should be there. So this is ridiculous.
Detmat Lukas 10:36
I asked, do you know how many cycles of repetition do the laboratories use to get their results? And Robert Koch Institute said, we don’t know.
Journalist 10:51
Their reply was literally we don’t know.
Detmat Lukas 10:54
Their reply was for these questions, please ask the laboratories and the makers of the test.
Journalist 11:05
Okay. But first of all, why would the Robert Koch Institute not know that information?
Detmat Lukas 11:12
They don’t care? That’s my guess. I don’t know. They just I do think that there is a political agenda behind what the Robert Koch Institute gets into the public, not a public agenda in what they work with, and what the results they get. But I assume in the meantime, that there is a highly political agenda on the top level of the Robert Koch Institute, following the official narrative that this Corona epidemic pandemic is really, really dangerous.
Meinrad Spitz 11:59
Where are the dead? Bring out the dead? Where are all the dead? For people who are really eager to know is explained in a few words, and it’s unmisinterpretable. It’s clear, it’s really clear since we now. Now at the beginning, it was difficult to explain about this curve. But now we have already the whole pandemic behind us. Red is 2018 with a big big peak of deaths in Germany. This is for Germany, deaths for Germany, and in 2018 the red curve over this over the average was in 2018 42,000. We had no lockdown we had no masks.
Meinrad Spitz 12:43
2600 people. That’s the average. In 2018 we had 40,000 additional deaths, 40,000 extra. Where were the cameras. Where was the drama? Where was the lockdown? Where were the masks? And now…nothing. Nothing. You see also this spike, this spike is the deaths of the heat wave in the summer. We had a heat wave in 2018 and we also had a heat wave in 2020. It’s absolutely the similar curve. This was the heat wave both in 2018 and green is 2020. And now towards winter, it’s rising again both in 2018 and in 2020. Then it’s normal, isn’t it? IT IS NORMAL.
Sarah 14:10
I’m Sarah, and this is one of my sons George. Yeah, I’ve worked in care for about 10 years. After having had the vaccine, simple infections, which often elderly people get like urinary tract infections and chest infections don’t seem to respond as well to antibiotics and elderly people are having blood clots, and their memory issues seem to be getting worse. I know people in my age group who have had the vaccine and now they’ve got things like fibromyalgia . They can’t seem to control their blood sugar, and their blood pressures are going through the ceiling and not responding to the new normal drugs.
Dr Stefan Lanka 14:46
If you inject the RNA inside tissue, whatever, in the blood in tissue in any body liquid, it’s always resulting in a huge big process of inflammation,
Sarah 15:01
It’s still in trials till 2023.
Journalist 15:04
Do many people even realise that?
Sarah 15:06
No.
George 15:06
They think the government wouldn’t give them something experimental.
Sarah 15:09
That’s the main thing most people cannot accept that the government will give you anything that might potentially kill you, they just cannot believe it.
Senior NHS Board Member Speaking to Brian Gerrish UK Column 18 April 2021 15:28
You can’t call it a vaccine because it doesn’t meet the definition. So I’m going to refer to it as an injection. There really were some long term safety issues, and stuff that we just didn’t know. So it really did take us all by surprise, the scope and speed at which they were moving. I know that the yellow card reporting system is not reflective of the amount of adverse events that are actually happening. I have asked multiple people from people actually injecting to people that sit on the board, they don’t know what’s in the vaccines, and they don’t really understand the risks.
Dr Stefan Lanka 16:12
As a transportable device for the RNA inside the body. They have nanoparticles out of special kind of fatty acids. But in reality, those nanoparticles are highly toxic, and you can’t possibly get[them] out of your system.
Senior NHS Board Member Speaking to Brian Gerrish UK Column 18 April 2021 16:34
And more eyes witness really, as well, alongside this is just a massive increase in propaganda,
NHS Vaccine Propaganda Advert 16:40
Join the millions already vaccinated to protect yourself and others, you need two doses for maximum protection.
Senior NHS Board Member Speaking to Brian Gerrish UK Column 18 April 2021 16:51
A complete lack of informed consent, people are often given the leaflet 20 minutes or 15 minutes before they have the injection. You know they’re already in the Vaccination Centre. Its a very slick operation. They’re told it’ll just be okay. Even if you take into account that the reporting isn’t accurate, when we think about any other drug in history that has gone through the NHS, it would not be acceptable for that many people to die full stop
NHS Vaccine Propaganda Advert 17:19
Every vaccine gives us hope. So play your part. Roll your sleeves up and get the vaccine.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 17:30
If you dare question anything about vaccination, however much you just say, well, this is a new vaccine, and we have to be a bit careful, you’re an anti vaxxer.
Sarah 17:39
If you’re a vulnerable person, either through age or illness, and you feel you need to take it, I’m fine with people having a free choice. My problem is I don’t know how we got to in a year, we need a vaccine to protect the young, the vulnerable, but now we seem to want to vaccinate 12 year olds,
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson 17:56
We are confident in the vaccines that have made such a difference to our lives. And we’re now intensifying that effort offering jabs to 12 to 15 year olds, on the advice of the chief medical officers who’ve given that advice based on the health, well being and educational prospects of the children themselves.
Senior NHS Board Member Speaking to Brian Gerrish UK Column 18 April 2021 18:21
I mean, we’re now moving into a territory where we are going to healthy, younger and fertile individuals and God forbid children. That quite frankly, it terrifies me.
Joe Biden 18:33
The safest thing for your child 12 and older is to get them vaccinated
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 18:43
We’ve reached this story of this terrible terrible disease and how it can be treated that lockdown works and that’s what we must do, it’s what we must have done otherwise millions upon millions would have died and nothing but vaccination works and if you suggest that using say vitamin or vitamin d3, or vitamin C or zinc or anything else you are held out, you know, and really and then you are censored
Joe Biden 19:08
We’re increasing the availability of new medicines recommended by real doctors not conspiracy theorists,
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 19:14
There is no debate, there can be no debate because if you state anything that doesn’t fit the current scientific narrative, you are silenced.
George 19:22
I was talking to a friend of mine and as soon as his son gets a small cough, he’s put into the corner, put plastic all over him, and put him in a plastic apron, put a face shield on him and set him separately away from all the other kids. So he’s ostracised, and then his mum has to come and he has to isolate for five days. You’re just making children afraid of smiling faces and shaking hands and it’s gonna last.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 19:46
It is not a disease you have to worry about at all. Unless you are going to lock down the whole of society over the flu, even colds will kill you. There are all sorts of things that can kill you. This is like oh my God nobody can die. It is not a serious infection but the vast majority of the population it is just not. And those are the statistics and figures you can show them and you can go blue in the face if you want. And especially for children cos children are normally quite vulnerable from influenza. Young children with SARS-CoV-2 they are not vulnerable at all.
Detmat Lukas 21:37
This test was not made for diagnostic purposes. It’s just a multiplication tool.
Dr Stefan Lanka 21:46
When you need a lot of duplication, which is called a cycle. First you have let’s say only one molecule you duplicate you have two molecules, then you duplicate again you have four molecules, then you duplicate it to the eight. And so you finally have your into your millions and billions you know. So this is all depending on the cycles, right? And really sober clear PCR has about 20 cycles. If you duplicate 30 times then PCR automatically it’s going to be dirty. That’s the internal saying of the biochemistry. It’s thirty. Why because the enzymes doing those duplications become old, they are heated up, cooled down, heated up, cooled down, heated up, cooled down. This is called a cycle, right. So the enzymes get old and work unspecific so they start to multiply everything.
Meinrad Spitz 22:53
Hello. Look I’ove brought you somie numbers today. The deaths per day. No excess mortality compared to 2018. Take a look. Where are the deaths? I don’t see any deaths. Will you take a look at the deaths per day?
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 23:12
The figure that I tend to just use is a thing called overall mortality, which is totally amiss from everything, because you can’t fudge those figures. You know, people are dead or they are alive, what they died of that’s a different issue. We’ve long had a situation of it’s very complex to say what actually killed somebody. But we are now in a world where if somebody has a positive COVID test, and then they die, they died of COVID. At the start of the epidemic if you got a positive COVID test or were diagnosed with COVID, if you died at any point at any time in the future, you were registered as a COVID death.
Meinrad Spitz 23:56
Good afternoon. Look, I ask I’ve brought you some deaths. Are you interested? Do you know them? This year: no excess mortality.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 24:02
Someone can arrive in hospital having been hit by a bus. You know, they can be lying there half dead, somebody will do a swab because everyone gets a swab when they arrive in hospital. If it shows a positive test says they’ve got COVID [and] they die, they will be recorded as a COVID death.
Meinrad Spitz 24:15
Good afternoon. I brought you some deaths. Take a look. No excess mortality. Will you look at the curve compared to 2018? No excess mortality.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 24:25
If someone has terminal cancer and they end up in hospital, they get a COVID test [and] it says its positively, they die as a COVID death. You know what does somebody die off? What’s the final thing that kills somebody? This is not really known, if you like, you know it is a kind of guesstimate as to what did they die off? You know, you can put down old age on a death certificate if you want but they have to be over 80 before you can put old age and and what did they die of? What did that person die off? You know, in people the commonest cause of death I see in elderly people in nursing homes, they just stop eating and drinking and die. What do you put on that death certificate? You know, now if they had a COVID positive swab, that would be they died of COVID. That’s just what is happening.
Meinrad Spitz 25:12
One moment please, Mr Schulz. Look at the deaths. We’re seeing no deaths. No deaths. Where are the deaths, Mr Schulz? Mr Schulz, where are the deaths? Mr de Maiziere, look at this. I have brought you the dead. The deaths per day. Where are the deaths, Mr de Maiziere? No deaths in 2020. Where are the deaths, Mr de Maiziere? Where are the deaths, Mr Schulz? Zero deaths, Mr Schulz.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 25:44
One of my rules of thumb is if you can’t find something out, which should be easy to find out, it means someone’s hiding something. The thing you can’t find out is exactly how many cycles they’ve been using in the laboratories. My understanding and I haven’t seen this unconfirmed is that they’ve been doing 42 cycles, which is like two times two times two times two times, which is just the very famous example was, the Chinese emperor was so pleased with the man who invented chess, he said, what would you like as a reward, he said, I’d like one grain of rice on the first square two grains of rice, on the second square four grains of rice on the third square. And the Emperor thought oh that doesn’t sound too much, didn’t realise it by the time he got to about the 32nd square, the entire production of rice for the rest of the universe was required.
Meinrad Spitz 26:38
Sometimes people ask me, are you a virologist? Yes. Do you know it better than the others? When I say no, I’m not a virologist, but I have looked into the media and I can see there are some biologists and they are not being heard. And they have very, very strong arguments and they will put without discussion into the dust, and that’s absolutely and in the conspiracy theories area. And that is what I can see. And so I can ask, and plead for hearing that
Fox News Channel 27:16
All these policies lockdown, social distancing, which in your view, has been the most injurious to the public and not suited to the science?
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 27:28
The looming vaccination.
Fox News Channel 27:31
But on the social distancing, and the masks just focusing on that for a moment. Which of those two in your research and your work has been the most displaced?
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 27:44
Both?
Fox News Channel 27:46
Both have? Not at all backed up by the science.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 27:52
Zero science.
Fox News Channel 27:54
So why why are they pushing this if zero science. I mean they’ll show videos of people coughing through masks and without masks and it’s terrifying people here in the country.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 28:04
This is something that we, and when I say we it’s hundreds and thousands of people standing up to say please all of you sit down and think about this, read up on this and then make up your own mind. Don’t believe things that people are telling you. Think for yourself and come to your own conclusions. You are forced to wear a mask, social distancing, everything that anyone was thought about it, read about it, knows is absolutely ridiculous nonsense.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 28:09
A great many people, not only me, have said all along this makes no sense, but now this work is available to see, the senselessness actually has to scream in your face. You can’t do this because of a pathogen that is no more dangeorus than a flu virus. That is so. That is so.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 29:23
What they’re doing is they’re forcing vaccination on people, and I believe they are killing people with this vaccination.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 29:30
And people who are not ill have no symptoms are tested with a test that is lying most of the time. And if it turns out positive, you have to do quarantine, measure the (inaudible)
Angela Merkel 29:55
Conspiracy theories are not only dangerous and untrue, they are also cynical and cruel to those who are suffering.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 30:03
All you have to do is go and read, and think.
Testing Propaganda Advert 30:07
To minimise the risk of community transmission, we should take the initiative to get tested. If you have any symptoms of COVID-19, even if those symptoms are mild, get a test.
Testing Propaganda Advert 30:18
Get tested, if you have COVID-19 symptoms, and make sure to quarantine yourself.
Testing Propaganda Advert 30:22
Get tested often, even with no symptoms,
Testing Propaganda Advert 30:24
Did you know that you might need to get tested for COVID-19 more than once.
Testing Propaganda Advert 30:28
Where healthy people need to get tested for COVID-19 get tested. Help us control the spread of COVID-19 and take the test.
Dr Stefan Lanka 30:39
When you use 30 cycles, everybody know the recites are getting dirty, because you amplify artificial things the enzymes are championing from here and there and you create sequences, which to possibly not exist in reality.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 30:55
So if you double something 42 times you’re up with a figure that is, has got so many zeros at the end of it, you can’t it’s, you know, it’s the biggliest number ever as Donald Trump would say. You can’t even understand how big that number is, alright? So essentially, if there was anything, any error in there that was getting multiplied up, after 42 cycles, you know, it’s just ridiculous,
Speaker Unknown 31:16
We are now having 40,000+ new cases a day, I would not be surprised if we go up to 100,000 a day, if this does not turn around. What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard, that if you get a cycle threshold of 35, or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. You almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. I would not be surprised if we go up to 100,000 a day if this does not turn around. So I think if somebody does come in with 37,38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides period.
Journalist 32:05
When they test people for COVID-19, how many cycles is this test going up to?
Dr Stefan Lanka 32:11
Well, I think here, you know, already to answer the question that how many cycles they are using, you know, and they’re using 45. And this is manifest madness. This is scientific craziness, you know. If you would be in a biochemical class at any university, you know, and you should claim this in public that you are using it, they would throw you out of university out of the lab, I mean, they probably put your directly into the Met House, you know, because this is so deeply unscientific, you cannot imagine.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 32:50
And now all of a sudden, now that the vaccines have arrived, the World Health Organisation says, well, actually, we should be running the cycles, it can only be up to 28 to get a positive result. Now, you can look at that in different ways, but it’s hard not to come to the conclusion somebody deciding this is just a huge manipulation of the data, because that’s going to, it’s going to change everything, if you like. And so it will mean that now people are not being found that they’re infected. Now, they would have been told they were infected before, so the vaccine looks enormously effective. I mean, most people, of course, this is kind of an understandable stuff, it’s statistics, it’s figures, oh, 28 cycles, 42 cycles. What does it matter? It’s, you know, it matters a huge amount. Of course, if we were only doing 28 cycles in the first year, the number of COVID cases would have probably dropped by about about 10 times or 100 times I don’t know.
Journalist 33:47
We wouldn’t have had a pandemic?
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 33:48
Well, they wouldn’t have had a pandemic, they wouldn’t have had a testing pandemic or a case pandemic. They wouldn’t have even known it was around now. Or even then. I mean,
Meinrad Spitz 33:59
Can you tell me why there is no excess mortality to be seen in a pandemic?
Politician 34:08
I don’t give information between door and door.
Meinrad Spitz 34:16
I don’t have a chance. Give me an appointment. May I visit you?
Politician 34:17
Leave it, I have to go home.
Meinrad Spitz 34:18
How else am I going to reach you? And it’s relevant. There’s no excess mortality. There’s no excess mortality. There’s no excess mortality. Would you like to see, here in the.
Politician 34:34
You may address me formally. But no, I don’t want to see it, thank you. will suffocate.
Meinrad Spitz 34:35
Take a look here. No excess mortality here. I’ll gladly address you formally, but there is no excess mortality. No over mortality. What I expect from a pandemic, from a severe pandemic, it’s something bigger than this peak. That’s what I am expecting. Even with all measures, even with all measures, I expect something like that in addition to all the measures done, and I see nothing,
Dr Malcolm Kendrick 35:04
It beggars belief that they are doing these things that are scientifically fraud in my opinion. I mean, I think you’d have to use the word fraud. These are scientific fraud, and no one’s picking them up on them. You know it’s almost like, oh, well, 28 cycles, 42 cycles.
Fox News Channel 35:20
So you believe that the COVID vaccine is not necessary.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi 35:26
I think it’s downright dangerous. And I warn you, if you go along these lines, you are going to go to your doom. And it’s so so unnecessary.
Fox News Channel 35:43
You’re right Dr Bhakdi, we can’t do this in three minutes but we’re gonna have you back because this is just too important not to. So I apologise for the short interview, the tyranny of cable, stay with us, the tyranny of cable .
Dr Stefan Lanka 35:57
The French philosopher Michel Foucault, Michel Foucault, he realised that the only field state has complete authority is medicine.
Joe Biden 36:10
Go get the shot as soon as you can,
Dr Stefan Lanka 36:13
because there’s a fear and fear is hypnotic. And if you don’t know where the pain is coming from, you or your beloved one is suffering or is even dying with you know, then you are in a dead end and you have to accept that the devil is around
Joe Biden 36:29
This is your choice, its life and death.
Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews 36:32
If you’re making the choice not to get vaccinated, then you’re making the wrong choice.
Tony Blair 36:37
If you’re double vaccinated, it should be much easier to come in and out of the country, and indeed round the world I think you will find that countries start to distinguish between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
Dr Stefan Lanka 36:47
But Corona offers a big chance for everybody to realise what’s going on and to face it
Dr Andreas Noack 36:55
Excuse me a moment. The police are here. The police are breaking down the door.