Are you not tired of websites like Wikipedia.org who slander and defame people like Dr Mike Yeadon and Dr Vernon Coleman, who actually care for humanity and are exposing these mainstream lying scientists and the official COVID narrative, which is based on pseudoscience and is harmful and designed to cause mass depopulation through Agenda 21 and its climate change lies.
Open an account on TrustPilot and write a one star review for Wikipedia.org. They are already at 2 stars, but we have the power, as a global entity, to shame these cowards and co-conspirators to murder, as evidence is showing these vaccines are premeditated murder.
Here are just a few one star comments already on the Wikipedia.org reviews on Trustpilot.
Wikipedia is no longer reliable
Not only has Wikipedia become 101% WOKE and corrupting the truth, it is not reliable. IF you search Lia Thomas, who has been in the news for weeks, because the he-she broke all women’s swimming records, far beyond what 99.9% could ever reach, there is ZERO search results at Wikipedia.
Wikipedia trying to Protect the Satanists…
Wikipedia trying to Protect the Satanists! This is the Worst thing I’ve ever read.. After i added In God we Trust, they removed it!
Editing History: https://en .wikipedia .org/w/index.php?title=Statue_of_Baphomet&action=history
I went on Wikipedia to check what it…
I went on Wikipedia to check what it said about a prominent youtube star with a large following. There should have been a lot of information there but what was more prominent was a recent episode. I went on the “talk” button and found that several of their own editors had said the article was biased and one that it reads like a real hatchet job. Quite likely the subject could sue for defamation. I will certainly not be donating any more money to Wikipedia
I personally know people that have been…
I personally know people that have been lied about continuously by this supposed trustworthy site, do not trust it, it allows people to input false narratives without any scrutiny, many many many lies on this website.
Biased Information
As mentioned in several other reviews, all information on Wikipedia is user-created, internally reviewed, and moderator approved. As with a TON of internet information being passed off as “news” and “fact”, there is no standard for these labels any more. Nowhere is there an authoritative source with which this information can be compared and proven. Yes, users generally cite sources, sometimes they’re even required to have sources; however, those sources are often incestuous – circular references that feed off each other, rather than having any foundation outside of the echo chamber.
Unreliable and politically biased
Like many other Americans, I’ve been using Wikipedia for many years now as an accessible database of somewhat reliable information. I have even donated to Wikipedia for several years in a row in order to do my part and help the site function without the need for annoying advertisements. However I immediately stopped donating to the organization once it ceased to be a politically neutral and unbiased source for information.
Check out the Wikipedia Trustpilot review page.