The NHS test and trace for coronavirus is ongoing. They are encouraging EVERYONE to get tested, whether they have symptoms, or not. The case deaths for Covid-19 have dropped, so the only way to keep this ‘pandemic’ going is to increase the NHS test and trace for coronavirus on humans, which will continue to produce ‘positives’ as it looks for any genetic material, and not the absolute source of infection.

Part Transcription of BitChute Video.

THE INFECTIOUS MYTH: Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory PDF

So, do you know how the tests work? It’s not a binary test like a pregnancy test. It’s called a PCR test and it involves amplifying genetic material by doubling it in dozens of cycles until you have billions or trillions of the original molecules, and then using those results to determine if you have enough of the identified RNA fragment to be considered positive.

Here’s the thing. At a certain point of amplification, every single person would test positive. They use an arbitrary cut off point where they stop doubling the material. That cut off point is different amongst different tests for Covid-19. In fact, there were ten different cut off points amongst 33 tests approved by the FDA.

Seems a little strange right? You might find it interesting that the Nobel prize winning inventor of the test did not believe it should be used to diagnose infectious illness, and perhaps you’ve heard about some of the problems with the test, such as the high rate of false positives? But in any case let’s say that after 37 times of doubling a specified general material they found in your body, they determined that you have enough of the RNA they are looking for to be considered positive.

Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in Science for inventing the PCR, is thoroughly convinced that HIV is not the cause of “AIDS”. With regard to the viral load tests, which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses, Mullis has stated: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.” PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.

What PCR does is to select a genetic sequence and then amplify it enormously. It can accomplish the equivalent of finding a needle in a haystack; it can amplify that needle into a haystack. Like an electronically amplified antenna, PCR greatly amplifies the signal, but it also greatly amplifies the noise. Since the amplification is exponential, the slightest error in measurement, the slightest contamination, can result in errors of many orders of magnitude.

This could make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory. But clearly there are clusters of people getting ill. Look at New York City. It must be a virus? However, if you were being poisoned by something in your environment it’s likely people near you are too, and if we commonly purge these poisons during specific times of the year, many people may have symptoms of illness all at once. This fits either theory.

Now, here’s where things get interesting. Let’s go to the diamond princess cruise ship situation. Did you know that people who were bunked together for days had conflicting positive and negative tests? How could one person have this highly infectious illness but not transmit it to somebody bunking with them for days? This would make sense in exosome theory where the balls of RNA are not contagious, but it would not make sense for virus theory where the balls of RNA are supposed to be highly infectious.

Let’s take a look at the first case of transmission in Illinois. A woman travelled to Wuhan came back and both she and her chronically ill husband ended up testing positive. Medical authorities then tracked over 300 people who had had close contact with them to see who acquired the virus. Guess what? Zero positives. This again would make sense in exosome theory since exosomes are not contagious, but it would not make sense for virus theory where this is supposed to be an infectious virus.

In fact, do you know that there are many documented cases all around the world of patients testing positive for this RNA fragment with no relevant travel history and no known possible contact with somebody who was infected? These were people in the middle of nowhere, early on in this whole crisis who suddenly were testing positive. This would make sense, again, in exosome theory where the RNA is being produced as an immune response within our cells, but it would not make sense for virus theory where you are supposed to have had contact with somebody with the virus.

What about the nigh levels of people testing positive who don’t get sick? In fact, 80 percent of people testing positive are either asymptomatic or have slight cold symptoms. Why? This would make sense in exosome theory since the RNA fragments are not the cause of the illness, but it would not make sense for virus theory where this virus is supposed to cause the illness. Things get even stranger. Did you know that some people go from testing positive to testing negative to testing positive again in a matter of days? That would make sense for exosome theory where perhaps the calls are simply releasing more of these exesomes depending on certain conditions, but it doesn’t make sense in virus theory where you are supposedly infected until you rid yourself of the virus.

So which of these theories seems more likely to you? What if you heard that there were virologists who believe that viruses are actually exosomes? What if I told you that doctors and other scientific experts also believe this? Ultimately, regardless of which theory you believe in at this point, the established infectious virus theory or the emerging theory of exosomes, how confident are you in the PCR test? Are you really interested in having your life hinged on the results you get from this potentially meaningless test? Do you ant your loved ones tested? Do you want to be tested, or shall we perhaps refuse the test?

The increase in people testing ‘positive’  through this NHS test and trace for coronavirus further excuses these governmental draconian measures being put into place propagated by the media that the world is facing a pandemic. The NHS test and trace for coronavirus does not work to detect this particular infection called Covid-19. Our Governments are following this National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan by the Rockefeller Foundation.

NATIONAL COVID-19 TESTING ACTION PLAN – The Rockefeller Foundation

No doubt about it, there is no coronavirus to fear. The fear itself in this backward submissive society is driven by the demonic mainstream media. Even through fraudulent means, Bill Gates and his globalist friends want to bring about their United Nations sustainable development programme to depopulate the world using the coronavirus as its excuse. The word Covid-19 has been heavily programmed into the masses for six months. We cannot watch a YouTube video without Covid-19 beneath it.  Saving lives was never the plan with this supposed new killer virus. The NHS is a huge propaganda tool and they deserve no claps or praise for their silence in promoting such an evil agenda with this NHS test and trace for coronavirus programme.

See what Imperial College Healthcare NHS say themselves on the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test. There is absolutely no evidence that they are testing for this specific Covid-19 virus, because in the second paragraph it states they detect RNA in the genetic material, then a reagent is added to it, which then creates billions of copies to detect a positive result. How do they know it is the Covid-19 that they are testing for? How do they not just know it’s the common flu or cold virus that is providing a positive? It is completely wrong to lock down entire towns and cities due to the inaccurate NHS test and trace for coronavirus programme.

This 67 minute recording is fabulous and features expert information from researchers, Alfa Vedic and David Crowe.

COVID-19 & The Infectious Myth with David Crowe MP3 – 67 minutes

This other 19 minute recording with Dr Stefan Lanka is helpful and discusses the RT-PCR inaccurate testing on the HIV virus. This is the same method that relies on amplification that the NHS test and trace for coronavirus are relying upon to deem a human ‘positive’ for Covid-19.

Dr Stefan Lanka on RT-PCR Test: ‘Absolutely Invalid’ MP3 – Approx 20 minutes